Pittsburg — commute flow to neighboring towns/cities (2023)
Baker township — 128 (Higher)Crawford township — 7 (Middle)Frontenac — 571 (Higher)Girard — 272 (Higher)Grant township — 34 (Upper-middle)Lincoln township — 12 (Middle)Mulberry — 0 (Lower)Osage township — 2 (Lower)Sheridan township — 10 (Middle)Sherman township — 4 (Lower-middle)Walnut township — 3 (Lower-middle)Washington township — 67 (Upper-middle)Pittsburg — no data (unmeasured)
Where this is
Shading: Total Jobs
Lower (0 to 2)Lower-middle (3 to 4)Middle (7 to 12)Upper-middle (34 to 67)Higher (128 to 571)No data
Each unit is shaded by its Total Jobs value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a neighboring town/city to see its own commute flow.

Town/City29 or younger30 to 5455 or olderTotal
Frontenac15533383571
Girard9711560272
Wichita4814948245
Parsons499455198
Fort Scott5010426180
Joplin township397335147
Baker township416621128
Coffeyville366020116
Topeka275628111
Overland Park32452299

Scroll to Top