Emma township — commute flow to neighboring towns/cities (2023)
Alta township — 26 (Middle)Burrton township — 32 (Upper-middle)Darlington township — 13 (Lower-middle)Garden township — 23 (Lower-middle)Halstead — 47 (Higher)Halstead township — 35 (Upper-middle)Highland township — 34 (Upper-middle)Lake township — 2 (Lower)Lakin township — 5 (Lower)Macon township — 26 (Middle)Newton — 776 (Higher)Newton township — 82 (Higher)Pleasant township — 23 (Lower-middle)Richland township — 7 (Lower)Sedgwick township — 29 (Middle)Walton township — 56 (Higher)Emma township — no data (unmeasured)
Where this is
Shading: Total Jobs
Lower (2 to 7)Lower-middle (13 to 23)Middle (26 to 29)Upper-middle (32 to 35)Higher (47 to 776)No data
Each unit is shaded by its Total Jobs value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a neighboring town/city to see its own commute flow.

Town/CityTotal Jobs
Newton776
Wichita354
Hutchinson88
Newton township82
McPherson70
Walton township56
Halstead47
Hillsboro45
Peabody township44
Mound township42

Scroll to Top