Grand Meadow township — commute flow to neighboring towns/cities (2023)
Adams — 0 (Upper-middle)Adams township — 0 (Upper-middle)Austin — 11 (Higher)Austin township — 0 (Upper-middle)Bennington township — 0 (Upper-middle)Brownsdale — 0 (Upper-middle)Clayton township — 1 (Higher)Dexter — 1 (Higher)Dexter township — 0 (Upper-middle)Elkton — 0 (Upper-middle)Frankford township — 3 (Higher)Grand Meadow — 15 (Higher)Lansing township — 0 (Upper-middle)Le Roy — 2 (Higher)Le Roy township — 0 (Upper-middle)Lodi township — 0 (Upper-middle)Lyle — 0 (Upper-middle)Lyle township — 0 (Upper-middle)Mapleview — 0 (Upper-middle)Marshall township — 0 (Upper-middle)Nevada township — 0 (Upper-middle)Pleasant Valley township — 0 (Upper-middle)Racine — 2 (Higher)Racine township — 0 (Upper-middle)Red Rock township — 0 (Upper-middle)Rose Creek — 1 (Higher)Sargeant — 0 (Upper-middle)Sargeant township — 0 (Upper-middle)Taopi — 0 (Upper-middle)Udolpho township — 1 (Higher)Waltham — 0 (Upper-middle)Waltham township — 0 (Upper-middle)Windom township — 0 (Upper-middle)Grand Meadow township — no data (unmeasured)
Where this is
Shading: Total Jobs
Upper-middle (0)Higher (1 to 15)No data
Each unit is shaded by its Total Jobs value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a neighboring town/city to see its own commute flow.

Town/CityGoods ProducingTrade, Transport & UtilitiesAll Other ServicesTotal
Rochester996886
Grand Meadow021315
Austin02911
Stewartville2417
Spring Valley2125
Frankford township0033
Burnsville1012
Edina0022
Minneapolis0112
Montgomery2002

Scroll to Top