Bowman — commute flow to neighboring towns/cities (2023)
Adelaide township — 5 (Upper-middle)Amor township — 2 (Lower-middle)Bowman township — 58 (Higher)Boyesen township — 0 (Lower)Buena Vista township — 3 (Middle)Fischbein township — 3 (Middle)Gascoyne — 6 (Higher)Gascoyne township — 3 (Middle)Gem township — 2 (Lower-middle)Goldfield township — 1 (Lower-middle)Grainbelt township — 6 (Higher)Grand River township — 2 (Lower-middle)Haley township — 2 (Lower-middle)Hart UT — 1 (Lower-middle)Ladd township — 0 (Lower)Langberg township — 0 (Lower)Marion township — 2 (Lower-middle)Minnehaha township — 4 (Upper-middle)Nebo township — 4 (Upper-middle)Rhame — 19 (Higher)Rhame township — 3 (Middle)Scranton — 32 (Higher)Scranton township — 4 (Upper-middle)Star township — 5 (Upper-middle)Stillwater township — 6 (Higher)Sunny Slope township — 0 (Lower)Talbot township — 8 (Higher)West Bowman UT — 21 (Higher)Whiting township — 4 (Upper-middle)Bowman — no data (unmeasured)
Where this is
Shading: Total Jobs
Lower (0)Lower-middle (1 to 2)Middle (3)Upper-middle (4 to 5)Higher (6 to 58)No data
Each unit is shaded by its Total Jobs value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a neighboring town/city to see its own commute flow.

Town/CityTotal Jobs
Bowman township58
Scranton32
Dickinson32
West Bowman UT21
Rhame19
Bismarck18
Glendive CCD11
Hettinger9
Minot9
Talbot township8

Scroll to Top