Effective Tax Rate
◆ 2022: Near typical county (-0.07 pts) map ↗
| This county | ||
| Total federal tax | $4.09B | |
| Adjusted gross income | $30.23B | |
| Effective rate | 13.53% | |
| Compared with | ||
| Typical (median) county | 13.61% | -0.08 pts |
| National (AGI-weighted) | 15.23% | -1.70 pts |
348,200 returns filed
◆ 2021: Near typical county (-0.18 pts) map ↗ ▶ on map
| This county | ||
| Total federal tax | $4.20B | |
| Adjusted gross income | $29.17B | |
| Effective rate | 14.39% | |
| Compared with | ||
| Typical (median) county | 14.57% | -0.18 pts |
| National (AGI-weighted) | 16.15% | -1.76 pts |
349,770 returns filed
◆ 2020: Near typical county (+0.00 pts) map ↗
| This county | ||
| Total federal tax | $3.35B | |
| Adjusted gross income | $26.08B | |
| Effective rate | 12.85% | |
| Compared with | ||
| Typical (median) county | 12.85% | +0.00 pts |
| National (AGI-weighted) | 14.45% | -1.60 pts |
359,830 returns filed
◆ 2019: Near typical county (+0.32 pts) map ↗
| This county | ||
| Total federal tax | $3.33B | |
| Adjusted gross income | $26.03B | |
| Effective rate | 12.81% | |
| Compared with | ||
| Typical (median) county | 12.49% | +0.32 pts |
| National (AGI-weighted) | 14.01% | -1.20 pts |
356,530 returns filed
Effective Tax Rate — 2021, across United States
Shading: Effective Tax Rate
Lower (-2.74 pts to -0.91 pts)Lower-middle (-0.69 pts to -0.18 pts)Middle (-0.17 pts to +0.30 pts)Upper-middle (+0.31 pts to +1.72 pts)Higher (+2.06 pts to +5.42 pts)No data
Each unit is shaded by its Effective Tax Rate value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
AK's effective tax rate is 14.39% — 0.18 pts below the typical U.S. county (14.57%), 32nd of 51 shown.
Ranked by Effective Tax Rate among the 51 units measured here for 2021. Rank groups them into equal-count bands (Lower→Higher). Typical (median) here: 14.57%. 5 shown as no data.
| Unit | Rate | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| DC | 19.99% | Higher |
| CT | 18.91% | Higher |
| NY | 18.69% | Higher |
| MA | 18.37% | Higher |
| CA | 18.13% | Higher |
| NJ | 17.38% | Higher |
| FL | 17.07% | Higher |
| WA | 16.94% | Higher |
| WY | 16.74% | Higher |
| NV | 16.73% | Higher |
| NH | 16.63% | Higher |
| IL | 16.29% | Upper-middle |
| CO | 16.19% | Upper-middle |
| TX | 16.08% | Upper-middle |
| VA | 15.77% | Upper-middle |
| MD | 15.77% | Upper-middle |
| TN | 15.25% | Upper-middle |
| GA | 15.20% | Upper-middle |
| PA | 15.12% | Upper-middle |
| UT | 15.06% | Upper-middle |
| AZ | 14.88% | Upper-middle |
| MN | 14.87% | Middle |
| RI | 14.71% | Middle |
| NC | 14.60% | Middle |
| OR | 14.58% | Middle |
| ND | 14.57% | Middle |
| SD | 14.46% | Middle |
| DE | 14.44% | Middle |
| KS | 14.43% | Middle |
| MT | 14.41% | Middle |
| LA | 14.40% | Middle |
| AK (selected) | 14.39% | Lower-middle |
| MO | 14.27% | Lower-middle |
| ID | 14.24% | Lower-middle |
| NE | 14.12% | Lower-middle |
| MI | 14.11% | Lower-middle |
| OH | 14.03% | Lower-middle |
| HI | 14.03% | Lower-middle |
| SC | 14.00% | Lower-middle |
| WI | 13.93% | Lower-middle |
| VT | 13.87% | Lower-middle |
| AR | 13.66% | Lower |
| ME | 13.58% | Lower |
| IN | 13.45% | Lower |
| AL | 13.44% | Lower |
| OK | 13.30% | Lower |
| IA | 13.21% | Lower |
| KY | 12.99% | Lower |
| NM | 12.73% | Lower |
| MS | 12.17% | Lower |
| WV | 11.83% | Lower |
| American Samoa | — | No data |
| Guam | — | No data |
| state_69 | — | No data |
| Puerto Rico | — | No data |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | — | No data |
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.
Shading by Effective Tax Rate for 2021; units without a value for this measure/year are shown as “no data.”