Social Vulnerability Index Recalculation

The Social Vulnerability Index Recalculation is based on the important work of the federal Centers for Disease Control. With the future of that index in doubt, the same federal datasets and methodologies were used to carry the index forward.

The most recent SVI uses the 2022 American Communities Survey as its base. This recalculation matches the 2022 baseline 100 percent. The 2022 methodologies form the basis of the updated calculations for subsequent ACS vintages. This platform will run updates on all new ACS releases.

Should the SVI be updated with changed methodologies, this platform will update to match, while preserving the 2022 methodologies for comparison purposes.

Compare
NationallyWithin its state

Washington County — Social Vulnerability Index

Unofficial CDC-method recomputation, 2020–2024 ACS 5-year
Washington County — Social Vulnerability Index by census tract
Tract 1.00 — 84 (Upper-middle)Tract 2.00 — 35 (Lower-middle)Tract 3.01 — 76 (Upper-middle)Tract 3.02 — 88 (Higher)Tract 4.00 — 94 (Higher)Tract 5.00 — 93 (Higher)Tract 6.01 — 85 (Higher)Tract 6.02 — 74 (Upper-middle)Tract 7.00 — 91 (Higher)Tract 8.00 — 93 (Higher)Tract 9.00 — 93 (Higher)Tract 10.01 — 76 (Upper-middle)Tract 10.02 — 38 (Lower-middle)Tract 101.00 — 17 (Lower)Tract 102.00 — 25 (Lower-middle)Tract 103.00 — 46 (Middle)Tract 104.01 — 44 (Middle)Tract 104.02 — 58 (Upper-middle)Tract 106.00 — 27 (Lower-middle)Tract 107.00 — 28 (Lower-middle)Tract 108.02 — 49 (Middle)Tract 108.03 — 59 (Upper-middle)Tract 109.01 — 20 (Lower)Tract 109.02 — 9 (Lower)Tract 110.00 — no data (unmeasured)Tract 111.00 — 49 (Middle)Tract 112.02 — 69 (Upper-middle)Tract 112.03 — 52 (Middle)Tract 112.04 — 55 (Middle)Tract 113.01 — 33 (Lower-middle)Tract 113.02 — 18 (Lower)Tract 114.00 — 42 (Lower-middle)Tract 115.01 — 11 (Lower)Tract 115.02 — 14 (Lower)Tract 116.00 — 11 (Lower)Tract 117.00 — 51 (Middle)
Where this is
Shading: Overall SVI Percentile
Lower (9 to 20)Lower-middle (25 to 42)Middle (44 to 55)Upper-middle (58 to 84)Higher (85 to 94)No data
Each unit is shaded by its Overall SVI Percentile value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a tract to see its overall percentile and theme scores.

Median tract: 49th percentile (among all U.S. tracts).
These tracts span the 9th percentile to the 94th percentile. The width of that range is the internal disparity.
Well above the median8 (23%) · 27,646 people
Above the median4 (11%) · 16,280 people
Near the median10 (29%) · 54,551 people
Below the median7 (20%) · 33,763 people
Well below the median6 (17%) · 18,518 people
Widest spread across these tracts: Socioeconomic Status — this theme most separates the higher- and lower-ranked tracts here.
The SVI ranks each tract's position relative to a comparison set; it is not averaged into one number for the area, because percentiles do not average meaningfully. The distribution — median, range, and shape below — is the summary.
Well above the median — 8 tracts (80th–100th percentile)
Tract 4.00 (pop. 1,786) — 94th percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (well above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above).
Tract 5.00 (pop. 6,052) — 93rd percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 8.00 (pop. 3,907) — 93rd percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 9.00 (pop. 3,808) — 93rd percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (well above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above).
Tract 7.00 (pop. 2,935) — 91st percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above).
Tract 3.02 (pop. 2,936) — 88th percentile — Well above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above) and Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 6.01 (pop. 2,271) — 85th percentile — Well above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Household Characteristics.
Tract 1.00 (pop. 3,951) — 84th percentile — Well above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Above the median — 4 tracts (60th–80th percentile)
Tract 3.01 (pop. 3,255) — 76th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above) and Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 10.01 (pop. 4,651) — 76th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 6.02 (pop. 3,208) — 74th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above) and Household Characteristics (above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 112.02 (pop. 5,166) — 69th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above) and Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status; below the median on Housing Type & Transportation.
Near the median — 10 tracts (40th–60th percentile)
Tract 108.03 (pop. 4,502) — 59th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 104.02 (pop. 6,305) — 58th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 112.04 (pop. 4,982) — 55th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 112.03 (pop. 5,389) — 52nd percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status; below the median on Socioeconomic Status.
Tract 117.00 (pop. 6,091) — 51st percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 111.00 (pop. 6,471) — 49th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status; below the median on Socioeconomic Status.
Tract 108.02 (pop. 2,537) — 49th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 103.00 (pop. 7,637) — 46th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status.
Tract 104.01 (pop. 4,570) — 44th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 114.00 (pop. 6,067) — 42nd percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Household Characteristics; below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Below the median — 7 tracts (20th–40th percentile)
Tract 10.02 (pop. 3,796) — 38th percentile — Below the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 2.00 (pop. 3,927) — 35th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Household Characteristics.
Tract 113.01 (pop. 5,332) — 33rd percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 107.00 (pop. 3,163) — 28th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 106.00 (pop. 5,523) — 27th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 102.00 (pop. 4,702) — 25th percentile — Below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 109.01 (pop. 7,320) — 20th percentile — Below the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above); below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Well below the median — 6 tracts (0th–20th percentile)
Tract 113.02 (pop. 3,811) — 18th percentile — Well below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 101.00 (pop. 1,095) — 17th percentile — Well below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 115.02 (pop. 3,326) — 14th percentile — Well below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 116.00 (pop. 2,673) — 11th percentile — Well below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 115.01 (pop. 4,609) — 11th percentile — Well below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 109.02 (pop. 3,004) — 9th percentile — Well below the median
Below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
1 tract unranked — no population or suppressed
These carry no percentile (zero-population or suppressed data, typically water and special-use tracts). They are excluded from the bands, median and range above, and are never shown as a low score.
SVI = the CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index, recomputed by this platform from American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates using CDC's published method. Percentiles rank each tract against all U.S. tracts. "Vulnerability" is the name of CDC's index; the platform reports where a place ranks on it, and does not grade places or their residents.
Top-decile flags follow CDC's own convention (≥ 90th percentile) and are attributed as such; they are not part of an official CDC distribution.

Scroll to Top