Social Vulnerability Index Recalculation

The Social Vulnerability Index Recalculation is based on the important work of the federal Centers for Disease Control. With the future of that index in doubt, the same federal datasets and methodologies were used to carry the index forward.

The most recent SVI uses the 2022 American Communities Survey as its base. This recalculation matches the 2022 baseline 100 percent. The 2022 methodologies form the basis of the updated calculations for subsequent ACS vintages. This platform will run updates on all new ACS releases.

Should the SVI be updated with changed methodologies, this platform will update to match, while preserving the 2022 methodologies for comparison purposes.

Compare
NationallyWithin its state

Nash County — Social Vulnerability Index

Unofficial CDC-method recomputation, 2020–2024 ACS 5-year
Nash County — Social Vulnerability Index by census tract
Tract 102.00 — 97 (Higher)Tract 103.01 — 84 (Higher)Tract 103.02 — 38 (Lower)Tract 104.00 — 80 (Higher)Tract 105.03 — 51 (Lower-middle)Tract 105.04 — 56 (Lower-middle)Tract 105.05 — 59 (Middle)Tract 105.06 — 56 (Lower-middle)Tract 106.01 — 79 (Higher)Tract 106.03 — 65 (Middle)Tract 106.04 — 74 (Upper-middle)Tract 107.00 — 66 (Middle)Tract 108.01 — 31 (Lower)Tract 108.02 — 18 (Lower)Tract 109.00 — 91 (Higher)Tract 110.00 — 68 (Upper-middle)Tract 111.01 — 42 (Lower-middle)Tract 111.03 — 77 (Upper-middle)Tract 111.04 — 62 (Middle)Tract 112.01 — 26 (Lower)Tract 112.02 — 33 (Lower)Tract 113.00 — 76 (Upper-middle)Tract 114.00 — 57 (Lower-middle)Tract 115.01 — 69 (Upper-middle)Tract 115.02 — 65 (Middle)
Where this is
Shading: Overall SVI Percentile
Lower (18 to 38)Lower-middle (42 to 57)Middle (59 to 66)Upper-middle (68 to 77)Higher (79 to 97)
Each unit is shaded by its Overall SVI Percentile value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a tract to see its overall percentile and theme scores.

Median tract: 65th percentile (among all U.S. tracts).
These tracts span the 18th percentile to the 97th percentile. The width of that range is the internal disparity.
Well above the median4 (16%) · 16,839 people
Above the median10 (40%) · 36,600 people
Near the median6 (24%) · 25,636 people
Below the median4 (16%) · 10,802 people
Well below the median1 (4%) · 6,339 people
Widest spread across these tracts: Household Characteristics — this theme most separates the higher- and lower-ranked tracts here.
The SVI ranks each tract's position relative to a comparison set; it is not averaged into one number for the area, because percentiles do not average meaningfully. The distribution — median, range, and shape below — is the summary.
Tract 102.00 (pop. 4,660) — 97th percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (well above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above).
Tract 109.00 (pop. 5,098) — 91st percentile — Well above the median CDC-based flag ≥ 90th percentile
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (well above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above).
Tract 103.01 (pop. 3,610) — 84th percentile — Well above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above).
Tract 104.00 (pop. 3,471) — 80th percentile — Well above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (above) and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (well above); near the median on Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 106.01 (pop. 2,705) — 79th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (well above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status.
Tract 111.03 (pop. 5,778) — 77th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above).
Tract 113.00 (pop. 5,092) — 76th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 106.04 (pop. 3,444) — 74th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status.
Tract 115.01 (pop. 2,794) — 69th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above) and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 110.00 (pop. 4,653) — 68th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (above) and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 107.00 (pop. 3,001) — 66th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); below the median on Household Characteristics.
Tract 106.03 (pop. 2,697) — 65th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above) and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 115.02 (pop. 3,958) — 65th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above), Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status.
Tract 111.04 (pop. 2,478) — 62nd percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above); near the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 105.05 (pop. 3,161) — 59th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above) and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 114.00 (pop. 4,772) — 57th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 105.06 (pop. 4,901) — 56th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics.
Tract 105.04 (pop. 4,935) — 56th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics.
Tract 105.03 (pop. 1,810) — 51st percentile — Near the median
Driven by Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Household Characteristics.
Tract 111.01 (pop. 6,057) — 42nd percentile — Near the median
Driven by Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Household Characteristics.
Tract 103.02 (pop. 2,770) — 38th percentile — Below the median
Driven by Racial & Ethnic Minority Status (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 112.02 (pop. 3,035) — 33rd percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 108.01 (pop. 1,195) — 31st percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status; below the median on Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 112.01 (pop. 3,802) — 26th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status; below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 108.02 (pop. 6,339) — 18th percentile — Well below the median
Near the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status; below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation.
SVI = the CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index, recomputed by this platform from American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates using CDC's published method. Percentiles rank each tract against all U.S. tracts. "Vulnerability" is the name of CDC's index; the platform reports where a place ranks on it, and does not grade places or their residents.
Top-decile flags follow CDC's own convention (≥ 90th percentile) and are attributed as such; they are not part of an official CDC distribution.

Scroll to Top