Social Vulnerability Index Recalculation

The Social Vulnerability Index Recalculation is based on the important work of the federal Centers for Disease Control. With the future of that index in doubt, the same federal datasets and methodologies were used to carry the index forward.

The most recent SVI uses the 2022 American Communities Survey as its base. This recalculation matches the 2022 baseline 100 percent. The 2022 methodologies form the basis of the updated calculations for subsequent ACS vintages. This platform will run updates on all new ACS releases.

Should the SVI be updated with changed methodologies, this platform will update to match, while preserving the 2022 methodologies for comparison purposes.

Compare
NationallyWithin its state

Clearfield County — Social Vulnerability Index

Unofficial CDC-method recomputation, 2020–2024 ACS 5-year
Clearfield County — Social Vulnerability Index by census tract
Tract 3301.00 — 70 (Higher)Tract 3302.00 — 13 (Lower)Tract 3303.00 — 34 (Lower-middle)Tract 3304.00 — 20 (Lower)Tract 3305.00 — 57 (Upper-middle)Tract 3306.00 — 67 (Higher)Tract 3307.00 — 49 (Middle)Tract 3308.00 — 34 (Lower-middle)Tract 3309.00 — 64 (Upper-middle)Tract 3310.00 — 20 (Lower)Tract 3311.00 — 69 (Higher)Tract 3312.00 — 51 (Middle)Tract 3313.00 — 58 (Upper-middle)Tract 3314.01 — 31 (Lower)Tract 3314.02 — 52 (Middle)Tract 3315.00 — 34 (Lower-middle)Tract 3316.00 — 44 (Lower-middle)Tract 3317.00 — 51 (Middle)Tract 3318.00 — 61 (Upper-middle)Tract 3319.00 — 71 (Higher)
Where this is
Shading: Overall SVI Percentile
Lower (13 to 31)Lower-middle (34 to 44)Middle (49 to 52)Upper-middle (57 to 64)Higher (67 to 71)
Each unit is shaded by its Overall SVI Percentile value and grouped into equal-count bands (quantiles) against the other units shown — lighter = lower, darker = higher. It ranks position among the units in view; it does not grade places, and the ranges shift with which units are shown.
The map is bounded to this parent geography — it shows the selected unit among its own siblings only, the same depth rule the drill-down uses. Shading ranks position on the measure among the units shown; it does not grade places.

Click a tract to see its overall percentile and theme scores.

Median tract: 51st percentile (among all U.S. tracts).
These tracts span the 13th percentile to the 71st percentile. The width of that range is the internal disparity.
Well above the median0 (0%) · 0 people
Above the median6 (30%) · 21,899 people
Near the median7 (35%) · 25,802 people
Below the median5 (25%) · 23,042 people
Well below the median2 (10%) · 7,892 people
Widest spread across these tracts: Housing Type & Transportation — this theme most separates the higher- and lower-ranked tracts here.
The SVI ranks each tract's position relative to a comparison set; it is not averaged into one number for the area, because percentiles do not average meaningfully. The distribution — median, range, and shape below — is the summary.
Tract 3319.00 (pop. 2,236) — 71st percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (well above), Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3301.00 (pop. 5,087) — 70th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (well above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3311.00 (pop. 2,933) — 69th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above), Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3306.00 (pop. 3,310) — 67th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3309.00 (pop. 5,856) — 64th percentile — Above the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3318.00 (pop. 2,477) — 61st percentile — Above the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Household Characteristics; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3313.00 (pop. 4,085) — 58th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (well above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3305.00 (pop. 4,381) — 57th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3314.02 (pop. 3,374) — 52nd percentile — Near the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above) and Housing Type & Transportation (well above); below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3312.00 (pop. 2,940) — 51st percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status and Household Characteristics; below the median on Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3317.00 (pop. 6,551) — 51st percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (well above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3307.00 (pop. 2,077) — 49th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Housing Type & Transportation (above); near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3316.00 (pop. 2,394) — 44th percentile — Near the median
Driven by Socioeconomic Status (above); below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 3303.00 (pop. 4,373) — 34th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Household Characteristics and Housing Type & Transportation; below the median on Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status.
Tract 3308.00 (pop. 6,882) — 34th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 3315.00 (pop. 1,775) — 34th percentile — Below the median
Driven by Household Characteristics (above); below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 3314.01 (pop. 3,317) — 31st percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Household Characteristics; below the median on Socioeconomic Status, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 3304.00 (pop. 6,695) — 20th percentile — Below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 3310.00 (pop. 4,863) — 20th percentile — Well below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
Tract 3302.00 (pop. 3,029) — 13th percentile — Well below the median
Near the median on Socioeconomic Status; below the median on Household Characteristics, Racial & Ethnic Minority Status and Housing Type & Transportation.
SVI = the CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index, recomputed by this platform from American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates using CDC's published method. Percentiles rank each tract against all U.S. tracts. "Vulnerability" is the name of CDC's index; the platform reports where a place ranks on it, and does not grade places or their residents.
Top-decile flags follow CDC's own convention (≥ 90th percentile) and are attributed as such; they are not part of an official CDC distribution.

Scroll to Top